<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Juniper XGS 5000 IPFIX Support: It&#8217;s really NetFlow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plixer.com/blog/netflow/juniper-xgs-5000-ipfix-support-its-really-netflow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plixer.com/blog/netflow/juniper-xgs-5000-ipfix-support-its-really-netflow/</link>
	<description>The NetFlow &#38; sFlow Reporting Resource</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:32:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.plixer.com/blog/netflow/juniper-xgs-5000-ipfix-support-its-really-netflow/comment-page-1/#comment-396730</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plixer.com/blog/?p=17742#comment-396730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you mean the IBM XGS 5000 Next Gen IPS, that documentation you found came from the Juniper STRM documentation, which is OEM  IBM Q1 LABS QRadar.

I think Juniper made a mistake and published it without proper review.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you mean the IBM XGS 5000 Next Gen IPS, that documentation you found came from the Juniper STRM documentation, which is OEM  IBM Q1 LABS QRadar.</p>
<p>I think Juniper made a mistake and published it without proper review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NetFlow vs. sFlow for Network Monitoring and Security: The Final Say - NetFlow &#38; sFlow Network Monitoring - Systrax</title>
		<link>http://www.plixer.com/blog/netflow/juniper-xgs-5000-ipfix-support-its-really-netflow/comment-page-1/#comment-378277</link>
		<dc:creator>NetFlow vs. sFlow for Network Monitoring and Security: The Final Say - NetFlow &#38; sFlow Network Monitoring - Systrax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plixer.com/blog/?p=17742#comment-378277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] vendors like Plixer ahead of time to ensure the resulting export will work correctly. Ellen&#8217;s post from last week illustrates this point. sFlow doesn&#8217;t have a problem with standardization primarily because [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vendors like Plixer ahead of time to ensure the resulting export will work correctly. Ellen&#8217;s post from last week illustrates this point. sFlow doesn&#8217;t have a problem with standardization primarily because [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
